IBS: The following text is the pre-publication version of the paper entitled ‘Irritable Bowel Syndrome: Symptomatic Treatment Approaches versus Integrative Psychotherapy’ Contemporary Hypnosis (2007), 24, (4): 161-177.
Tom Kraft, Harley Street, London, UK
David Kraft, London, UK
Worldwide search of existing treatments and case study
Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a common gastrointestinal (GI) disorder and accounts for up to 20% of the population in the United States (Brandt, Locke, Olden, Quigley, Schoenfeld, Shuster & Talley, 2002), while similar results are found in the United Kingdom (Kennedy, Jones, Darnley, Seed, Wessely & Chalder, 2005). Patients complain of a variety of symptoms which include constipation, diarrhoea, bloating, abdominal pain, frequency and urgency of defecation. There are two main diagnostic criteria that have been used for research and in clinical studies: the Manning criteria and the Rome Classifications (I, II and III). Although the recent Rome III Classification system has introduced IBS-M (mixed symptoms) and IBS-U (Undefined symptoms), some clinicians may, nevertheless, still find it useful to use the earlier IBS sub-divisions as shown below:
IBS-A=Alternating constipation and diarrhoea
IBS-O=Other abdominal symptoms
For the purposes of this paper, the authors have retained these earlier subdivisions for simplification.
In 1978, Manning and his colleagues devised criteria which distinguished IBS from organic diseases of the gastrointestinal tract (Manning, Thompson, Heaton & Morris 1978). They devised a questionnaire involving fifteen symptoms relating to bowel functioning, and they were as follows:
1 Looser stools at onset of pain
2 More frequent bowel movements at onset of pain
3 Pain eased after bowel movement (often)
4 Visible distension
5 Feeling of distension
6 Mucus per rectum
7 Feeling of incomplete emptying (often)
8 Bowel movement before breakfast
9 Nocturnal bowel movement
10 Urgency of defecation
11 Pain worse after bowel movement
12 Pain eased with flatus
13 Greater than or equal to 2 bowel movements between meals
14 Harder stools at onset of pain
15 Less frequent bowel movements at onset of pain
Since that time, more detailed classification systems have been introduced into the literature, at first Rome I and then Rome II. More recently, a simpler system (Rome III) was introduced in April 2006 by the American College of Gastroenterology Functional Disorders Task Force (American Gastroenterological Association, 2006), the main difference being that there is increased precision in the required frequency of particular symptoms for diagnosis. Furthermore, the single classification was based on stool consistency. For a more detailed description of the Rome III criteria see Drossman (2006).
Use of medication in the treatment of IBS
In this section, we are going to review the use of medication in the treatment of IBS and these fall into four main categories: (1) Antispasmodics, (2) Antidepressants, (3) Antidiarrhoeal Agents and (4) Serotonergic Modifying Drugs. Essentially, these drugs are used in an attempt to reduce the severity of individual symptoms.
Antispasmodics are particularly helpful for those patients suffering from IBS where abdominal pain is the predominant feature. These patients have a dysfunction of smooth muscle activity associated with visceral hypersensitivity (Schoenfeld, 2005): the effect of the antispasmodics is to reduce intestinal motility, alleviating pain in the abdomen. There have been many trials which have assessed the efficacy of antispasmodic agents in the treatment of IBS (see Table 1), and the consensus of opinion is that antispasmodics are of questionable value.
In the UK, Kennedy and colleagues (2005) carried out a controlled study comparing the effectiveness of mebeverine, used in conjunction with CBT, with mebeverine on its own. Of the 149 patients found to be suitable for the investigation, randomly, 72 of these were allocated to the mebeverine/CBT group and 77 to the mebeverine only group. Those patients in the mebeverine/CBT group were shown to have had a greater symptomatic improvement and, although there were inconsistencies in the results of the hospital anxiety and depression scale, there were significant improvements as measured by the work and social adjustment scales. Frequently used antispasmodics have been listed in the table below (table 1). It is important to note that patients who suffer from postprandial pain would be well advised to take the antispasmodic before meals (Poynard, Regimbeau & Benhamou, 2001).
The references given in tables 1-5 are samples of clinical studies only rather than a complete list.
Antispasmodics (Table 1)
|Name of Medication||Notes|
|Dicyclomine (US) (Dicycloverine Hydrochloride in the UK)||Used in the UK and the States; prescribed by GPs; used in clinical trials (Wheatley, 1976);|
|Hyoscyamine (US) (Hyoscine Butyl Bromide in the UK)||Used in the UK and the States; prescribed by GPs often in extreme cases; used in clinical trials (Ritchie & Truelove, 1979)|
|Atropine (UK)||Used in the UK by GPs|
|Mebeverine (UK)||Widely used in the UK; used in clinical trials (Kennedy, Jones, Darnley, Seed, Wessely & Chalder, 2005)|
|Others include Pinaverium, Cimetropium Bromide, Trimebutine, Pirenzepine and Otilium Bromide (US)||Used in clinical trials. Cimetropium Bromide (Piai, Visconti & Imbimbo, Minieri, Sollazzo & Mazzaca, 1987)|
It is well known that tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) are useful for relieving pain and it was for this reason that they were introduced for the treatment of IBS: it has been shown that low doses of tricyclic antidepressants reduce abdominal pain in these patients (Lembo & Rink, 2002). Drossman and colleagues (2003) carried out a randomized controlled trial in which they compared the use of desipramine versus placebo in 216 patients. In the analysis of the data, it was shown that there were no significant differences between the placebo and desipramine groups; however, further analysis revealed that patients with IBS-D benefited, whereas patients with IBS-C failed to improve-presumably, the drying quality of the medication was responsible for this difference. As a result, these authors reserve the tricyclic antidepressants for patients suffering from IBS-D and combine this with loperamide (Imodium). In addition, Schoenfeld (2005) concluded from his clinical work that tricyclic antidepressants improved global IBS symptoms in patients with IBS-D.
There have also been several studies which have evaluated the use of SSRI drugs in the treatment of IBS; SSRIs are also used by doctors in clinical practice for those patients with concomitant depression. Tack, Broekaert and Fischler (2006), in a randomized controlled trial (n=23), used citalopram and compared this with placebo, excluding any patients with a primary depressive disorder. Although Creed (2006) pointed out that there were several methodological errors in this study, nevertheless, it was shown that, as far as abdominal pain was concerned, citalopram was superior to placebo, although it had no effect on changes in mood, stool pattern or rectal distension.
Antidepressants (Table 2)
|Name of Medication||Notes|
|Desipramine (US)||Not available in the UK in 2007; used in clinical trials (Greenbaum and colleagues, 1987)|
|Trimipramine (US & UK)||Trade name 'Sumontil'; used in clinical trials (Myren, Groth, Larssen & Larsen, 1982)|
|Doxepin (US & UK)||Available in UK and US; used in clinical trials (Vij, Jiloha, Kumar, Madhu, Malika & Anand, 1991)|
|Amitriptyline (US & UK)||Widely used and prescribed by GPs; used in clinical trials (Steinhart, Wong & Zarr, 1981)|
|(+ SSRIs and SNRIs)||Other antidepressants that have been used include Paroxetine (an SSRI) and newer monoamines such as the serotonin noradrenaline re-uptake inhibitors (SNRIs)-Duloxetine (US & UK) and Venlafaxine (US & UK).|
A number of studies (Cann, Read, Holdsworth & Barends, 1984; Hovdenak, 1987; Efskind Bernklev & Vatn, 1996) have been carried out using the Antidiarrhoeal agent, Loperamide (Imodium), and results have indicated that this drug has been an effective treatment for patients suffering from diarrhoea, particularly those who have no associated abdominal pain. Loperamide decreases stool frequency, reduces the percentage of unformed stools and diminishes urgency. It reduces diarrhoea symptoms by slowing intestinal transit, increasing the absorption of water and ions and also by strengthening the anal sphincter tone (Johanson, 2004).
Antidiarrheal Medication (Table 3)
|Name of Medication||Notes|
|Loperamide (US & UK)||Trade name is Imodium; widely used; used in clinical trials (Efskind, Bernklev & Vatn, 1996)|
Serotonergic Modifying Drugs
Alosetron hydrochloride is a 5-hydroxytrytamine receptor (5-HT3) antagonist and is helpful in treating female patients suffering from IBS-D. Alosetron is not frequently used in clinical practice. It is available in the US and is marketed as Lotronex; however, doctors have been advised to prescribe this drug only after other more traditional treatments have failed. Alosetron is not available in the UK. The controlled trials indicate that Alosetron decreases gut transit, increases the absorption of fluid and also reduces pain in response to rectal distension. Alosetron thus alleviates not only the diarrhoea but also reduces other associated symptoms including abdominal pain and urgency. However, there is a number of adverse side effects, in particular it may give rise to constipation; at least 1% of the subjects reported that they had suffered from some side effects including constipation, nausea or abdominal pain; in addition, 0.1% of women experienced either severe constipation or ischaemic colitis necessitating hospitalization. It was for these reasons that the drug was withdrawn from the US market only to be reintroduced in 2002. Alosetron should only be prescribed for female patients who have not responded to standard forms of pharmacological treatment, and careful monitoring is recommended. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has warned that Alosetron has serious risks. The recommended dose for Alosetron is 1mg twice a day.
Tegaserod is a selective 5-hydroxitryptimine receptor agonist which is indicated for female patients suffering from IBS-C. This form of treatment may be considered for patients who have failed to respond to standard laxatives. Tegaserod is available in over 30 countries including the US but it is not available in the UK. The trade name for Tegaserod in the US is Zelnorm. The effect of this drug is to accelerate gastrointestinal transit, and also to increase fecal water and intestinal secretion (Johanson, 2004; Farthing 2004). In addition, Tegaserod reduces the afferent nerve impulses from the intestines which, in turn, reduce visceral hypersensitivity (Camilleri, 2001). There have been three main randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials in which the use of Tegaserod was compared with placebo in patients suffering from IBS-C (Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, 2002; Novick, Miner, Krause, Glebas, Bliesath, Ligozio, Rüegg & Lefkowitz, 2002; Müller-Lissner, Fumagalli , Bardhan, Pace, Pecher, Nault & Rüegg, 2001). These studies have shown that there is a statistical difference between patients treated with Tegaserod when compared to placebo: not only was there an improvement with regard to constipation and abdominal pain, but also, in two of the studies (Novick, Miner, Krause, Glebas, Bliesath, Ligozio, Rüegg & Lefkowitz, 2002; Müller-Lissner, Fumagalli, Bardhan, Pace, Pecher, Nault & Rüegg, 2001), where 6mg was administered twice daily over a 12 week period, there was global improvement including frequency, stool consistency and bloating. However, the main adverse affect of this drug is diarrhoea which, in extreme cases, leads to dehydration. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in the US has warned the public that there are risks associated with this drug. On March 30, 2007, the US Food and Drug Administration decided to withdraw Zelnorm, alleging that there was a link between prescriptions of the drug and heart attack or stroke.
Serotonergic Agonists/Antagonists (Table 4)
|Name of Medication||Notes|
|Alosetron (US)||Alosetron is a 5-hydroxytrytamine receptor antagonist and has been used in trials (Cremonini, Delgado-Aros & Camilleri, 2003). The drug is used to control diarrhoea-predominant IBS.|
|Tegaserod (US)||Tegaserod is a 5-hydroxytrytamine selective receptor agonist. Used in clinical trials (Novick, Miner, Krause, Glebas, Bliesath, Ligozio, Rüegg & Lefkowitz, 2002). See also abstract (Whorwell, Krumholz, Müller-Lissner, Schmitt, Dunger-Baldauf & Ruegg, 2000). The drug is used to control constipation-predominant IBS.|
|Other drugs include mianserin (US) & Buspirone (US)|
Patients with IBS often ask for dietary advice. It has been suggested by Floch and Narayan (2002) that it is helpful to exclude lactose containing products from the diet in order to establish whether this is the sole cause of the symptoms. There are many foods that contain lactose, particularly milk and milk products. There is also a group of patients who react adversely to fructose or Sorbitol. Floch and Narayan also recommend that caffeine containing products such as chocolate, tea, coffee, cocoa and many fizzy drinks-especially colas-should be removed from the diet as caffeine is a gut stimulant. In addition, other foods which are likely to give rise to hypersensitivity include eggs, soybeans and cashew nuts.
It is a commonly held belief that fibre has a beneficial effect on global symptoms (Alpers, 2006; Zuckerman, 2006). The rationale for adding fibre to the diet is that it produces softer and bulkier stools, it promotes colonic peristalsis and eases defecation; in addition, it is thought to accelerate the transit time in the gastrointestinal tract. Based on the premise that many IBS patients suffer from fibre depletion, doctors in clinical practice often introduce additional fibre into patients’ diets to ensure that they have a daily intake of 25g. Fibre, essentially consisting of polysaccharides which cannot be hydrolyzed by human enzymes, can be found in many food stuffs such as cereals, nuts, beans, vegetables and fruits (Floch & Narayan, 2002). The highest amount of fibre can be found in cereals such as All Bran and Wheat Bran, and in kidney beans and black-eyed beans, whereas lower amounts of fibre are present in vegetables, fruits and nuts.
Guar gum, a soluble fibre, is a mucilage taken from the Indian cluster bean (Cyamopsis tetragonolobus) and is used in food processing as a thickener and an emulsion stabilizer; it is also used in ice cream, cheese and processed cold meat. Although rarely used in clinical practice, Partially Hydrolyzed Guar gum (PHGG) is indicated for the treatment of patients who suffer from IBS-C; it reduces constipation and also has a benefitial effect on global IBS symptoms (Giannini, Mansi, Dulbecco, Savarino, 2006). The advantage of supplementing the diet with soluble fibre is that it not only hydrolyzes the stool but also promotes bacterial growth in the colon (Stephen and Cummings, 1980). Further, PHGG reduces gas production which, in turn, has the effect of reducing bloating: this supplement is available in powder form, and it is recommended that one teaspoon be added to eight ounces of fluid one to three times a day. It has also been shown that PHGG has been effective in the treatment of patients suffering from IBS-D: Homann and colleagues (1994) found that patients who received 20 grams of PHGG by enteral nutrition had significant decreases in diarrhoea, while the control group, who were given a non-supplemented enteral diet, continued to experience symptoms.
Peppermint oil is a naturally occurring carminative-a medicinal drug with antispasmodic qualities-which relaxes gastrointestinal smooth muscle (Rees, Evans and Rhodes, 1979). Peppermint oil is taken from the leaves and flowering tops of the peppermint plant (Mentha x piperita), its primary active component being menthol. Recent studies have shown that peppermint oil may be a simple and effective treatment for patients suffering from IBS. Kline, Kline, Di Palma and Barbero (2001) carried out a randomized, double-blind controlled trial on 42 children suffering from IBS: one group was given enteric-coated peppermint oil capsules and the other group, placebo. After two weeks, it was shown that 75% of the children who had taken the peppermint oil had a significant reduction in abdominal pain. Favourable results were also found in an earlier study (Liu, Chen, Yeh, Huang & Poon, 1997) in which 110 adults were randomly allocated to either Colpermin (consisting of enteric-coated capsules of peppermint oil), or placebo. The results of this study showed that the peppermint oil group compared favourably to placebo with regard to severity of abdominal pain (79% compared to 43%), abdominal distension (83% compared to 29%), reduced stool frequency (83% compared to 32%), reduced borborygmi (73% compared 31%) and flatulence (79% compared to 22%). It is important to note that peppermint oil should be taken in the form of an enteric-coated capsule because the peppermint oil must not be released in the stomach. If this should happen, for example if the patient chews the capsule, this may well lead to heartburn due to the relaxation of the oesophageal sphincter.
Prebiotics are defined as a group of non-digestible or partially digestible food ingredients whichselectively promote the growth of colonic bacteria, in particular lactic acid bacteria and a group of gram-positive anaerobic bacteria known as bifidobacteria (Tuohy, Probert, Smejkal & Gibson, 2003). They favourably influence the balance of the intestinal microflora (Van Loo, 2004). Most prebiotics are carbohydrates (oligosaccharides, for example) and may be found in unrefined wheat, unrefined barley, soybeans and Jerusalem artichokes. Prebiotic oligosaccharides may be added to processed foods and are also marketed in tablet form.
The World Health Organization and the Food Agricultural Organization of the United Nations define probiotics as, ‘live micro-organisms which when administered in adequate amounts confer a health benefit on the host’ (FAO/WHO Working Group Report, 2002). The normal microbial community in the gut consists of anaerobes including Bifidobacterium, Clostridium, Lactobacillus, Peptococcus and many others. These organisms counteract toxins and digest dietary products, but, perhaps their most important function is that they provide a defence against the colonization of pathogenic organisms (Young & Cash, 2006). Recently, probiotics have been added to cereal products and a large number of yoghurts; they can also be found in some vitamin preparations.
The value of probiotics in the treatment of IBS has been evaluated in several recent studies (Whorwell, Altringer, Morel, Bond, Charbonneau, O’Mahony, Kiely, Shanahan & Quigley, 2006; Niedzielin K, Kordecki Birkenfeld, 2001). In a recent study carried out by O’Mahony and colleagues (2005) two probiotics were compared with placebo in a randomized, double-blind trial. There were 77 patients in all. The patients were given Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium or placebo; and, while the patients receiving Lactobacillus showed no significant change when compared with placebo, the group who received Bifidobacterium made considerable improvement with regard to abdominal pain/discomfort, bloating/distension and bowel movement.
Diet Supplements -Diet Change, Fibre, Laxatives, Prebiotics and Probiotics (Table 5)
|Psyllium (US)||Soluble fibre, a bulk laxative; used in clinical trials (Longstreth, Fox, Youkeles, Forsythe & Wolochow, 1981)|
|Ispaghula Husk (US & UK)||Soluble fibre, a bulk laxative prescribed by GPs; used in clinical trials (Prior & Whorwell, 1987)|
|Corn Bran (US & UK)||Insoluble fibre; cereal; used in clinical trials (Cook, Irvine, Campbell, Shannon, Reddy & Collins, 1990)|
|Wheat Bran (US & UK)||Insoluble fibre; cereal; used in clinical trials (Snook & Shepherd, 1994)|
|Peppermint Oil (US & UK)||Prescribed by GPs; used in clinical trials (Rees, Evans & Rhodes, 1979)|
|Guar Gum (US)||A mucilage derived from the seeds of the Indian cluster bean and used in food processing as a thickener and emulsion stabilizer; used in clinical trials (Giannini, Mansi, Dulbecco & Savarino, 2006).|
|Prebiotics||Non-digestible food ingredients that stimulate growth of bifidobacteria. For example, Lactulose is prescribed in the UK for constipation-predominant IBS and it is available in a banana flavour solution. Prebiotics can also be found in some cereals. Used in clinical trials (Bittner, Croffut & Stranahan, 2005).|
|Probiotics||Live micro-organisms (Bifidobacterium and Clostridium). Probiotics are natural therapeutic agents and produce a first line defence against the colonization of pathogenic organisms. Also found in cereals and yoghurts. Used in clinical trials (see Young & Cash, 2006).|
|Avoiding Certain Foods.|
Some GPs ask their patients to avoid certain foods and to include an intake of 25g of fibre per day.
|The following foods have been pin-pointed as ones that often exacerbate IBS: wheat, milk, yeast, eggs and cashew nuts.|
Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy (CBT) and Irritable Bowel Syndrome
Early studies (Bennett and Wilkinson, 1985; Shaw, Srivastava, Sadlier, Swann, James & Rhodes, 1991), have demonstrated the efficacy of CBT for the treatment of IBS. Lynch and Zamble (1989) in a randomized controlled trial (n=24) compared a CBT group (using strategies including coping skills, assertiveness training, education and progressive muscle relaxation) with a waiting control group. The results showed that the CBT group improved significantly when compared with placebo. In an important, randomized study (Toner, Segal, Emmott, Myran, Ali, DiGasbarro & Stuckless, 1998), and one of the largest to date, 101 IBS patients were assigned to one of three groups: CBT (cognitive behaviour and relaxation), attentional-placebo control (psychoeducational group) and a group who received conventional medical treatment. It was shown that patients’ depressive symptoms and bloating were significantly improved in the CBT group when compared to the other control groups. In addition, patients in the CBT group rated the treatment as being more effective than the psychoeducational group as measured by Toner and colleagues’ Satisfaction Scale (Toner, Stuckless, Ali, Downie, Emmott & Akman, 1998).
Hypnosis and Psychological Factors in IBS Research
The use of antispasmodics, laxatives, antidiarrheal agents and even the more recently produced serotonergic receptor modifying drugs are considered, along with dietary modification, first line treatments in the Manchester Model. Whorwell (2006) recommends that hypnotherapy should be reserved for the treatment of refractory cases after simple measures have failed to alleviate symptoms.
Many studies have used the gut-directed hypnotherapy approach as pioneered by Whorwell, Prior and Faragher (1984). The Manchester Unit, which focuses on the use of hypnotherapy in the treatment of IBS, was founded by Whorwell in 1995. The Manchester Model has now become the standard approach for IBS treatment; an in depth account of this model, together with instructions for use, can be found in Gonsalkorale (2006), and an extensive list of controlled studies in Gholamrezaei, Ardestani and Emami (2006). Essentially, this consists of 7 to 12 sessions of hypnotherapy each of 30-60 minutes duration. The treatment involves induction, deepening, guided imagery, use of metaphors (such as the river), and direct application of hand warmth on the abdomen. The tree metaphor has also been used to represent strength and solidity: this image has been used successfully to counteract the stresses of every day life (Zimmerman, 2003). One of the important aims of this form of treatment is that, having learnt self hypnosis, patients are able to exercise control over their bowel function (Gonsalkorale, 2006). They are also given some education about normal gut function and visceral hypersensitivity. The majority of patients treated in this way have shown a remarkable improvement with regard to their symptomatology and quality of life. In many individuals, hypnosis has reduced anxiety and depression and this, in turn, has had a beneficial effect on global IBS symptoms (Gholamrezaei, Ardestani, Emani, 2006).
Zimmerman (2003) described the successful treatment of a 50-year-old, female patient who had had a one year history of IBS. This case study illustrates the use of the river as a metaphor. In the first two sessions, the author explained the nature of the treatment and taught her self hypnosis. Further, he described to her the use of the guided imagery which would assist her relaxation and improve her self control. In the third session, after induction and deepening using a guided imagery approach, the patient was encouraged to imagine walking through a beautiful wood on a spring day, to experience the sounds of the birds, to feel the pleasant sensations of fresh air on her face and to admire the beautiful trees. At this point, Zimmerman introduced the tree metaphor to provide the patient with a feeling of inner strength. She was then asked to imagine a crystal clear and free-flowing river in which she could see herself reflected in the water. Here an age regression technique was used: a comparison was made between the stream and the normal functioning of all her systems in the body, including her bowels. At this point, it was suggested that some stones should interrupt the free flow of the river, blocking the stream; here, she was instructed to clear out as much of the rubble as she felt capable of doing, and that this would have the effect of re-creating a smooth-flowing river that would run inside the whole of her body. This precipitated an abreaction and she began to cry. The patient was given three subsequent booster sessions; and, at one year follow-up, she reported that she had not only remained symptom free, but also, that her mood had improved and she had regained her ‘joy of living’.
A study was carried out by Houghton, Calvert, Jackson, Cooper and Whorwell (2002) which was designed to investigate the effect of emotion on visceral sensitivity. Patients were studied under four conditions-(1) waking state (control), (2) hypnosis with induced anger, (3) hypnosis with induced happiness or (4) hypnosis with suggestions of relaxation (neutral emotion). In this study, 20 patients were assessed (17 women, 3 men; age range 17-64); all patients were studied under fasting conditions and the readings were taken at the same time each day. In order to evoke the appropriate emotion, patients were asked, prior to the hypnosis, which sort of situations might produce the required emotional response; direct suggestions were used to elicit the appropriate emotion and, in the case of anger, patients were given relaxation and ego strengthening before disengagement. It was found that hypnotic relaxation significantly increased the rectal distension volumes required to produce symptoms of ‘first sensation’, ‘urgency’, ‘desire to defecate’ and ‘discomfort’. It was somewhat surprising that happiness appeared to have little effect when compared with relaxation or the waking state. Anger, on the other hand, had the effect of reducing the amount of distension required to elicit symptoms. This study supports the view that emotions are inextricably linked to visceral hypersensitivity and the perception of symptoms; it can also be concluded that hypnosis is a valuable tool for inducing relaxation and reducing IBS symptoms. Further, although specific symptoms may respond to medical or dietary measures as outlined above, none of these will encompass all the global symptoms of IBS. Hypnosis, on the other hand, compares very favourably with these symptomatic treatments as it is able to deal with the full spectrum of IBS symptoms (Lackner, Mesmer, Morley, Dowser & Hamilton, 2004; Klein, 1988).
The Use of Audiotapes in IBS
Forbes, MacAuley and Chiotakakou-Faliakou (2000) carried out an important study in which gut-directed hypnotherapy was compared with a carefully-prepared audiotape. In a randomized study of IBS patients (n=52; 37 women, 15 men) who had not responded either to dietary or pharmacological measures, it was found that 76% of the hypnotherapy patients improved and, remarkably, 59% improved with the use of an audiotape only. Although inferior to hypnotherapy, daily use of the audiotape, which provides background information about IBS, stress coping strategies and structured relaxation, is a cost effective form of treatment. The use of hypnotherapy and audiotapes for the treatment of IBS has been used by the St. Mark’s Hospital team in the UK since 1992.
Pamela, an extremely intelligent 54-year-old married woman, had been suffering from severe IBS symptoms including abdominal pain, bloating, urgency, and diarrhoea, which alternated with periods of constipation. She also complained that she was generally unwell and that she was severely incapacitated, so much so that she could not travel anywhere. Because her symptoms would come on unexpectedly, Pamela argued that this prevented her from going out, and this, in effect, put a stop to her teaching career. She was a bit uncertain about the duration of her IBS symptoms, but the letter from her referring doctor suggested that they had been present since the age of 18, although her symptoms had gradually worsened over the last few years since she had arrived back from Canada. It was suggested that she come for therapy once a week.
In the first session, accompanied by her husband, it was established that, quite apart from the IBS problem, she also suffered from Hashimoto’s thyroiditis for which she needed to take Thyroxin daily. She also suffered from psoriasis. The report from her doctor stated that she had seen many specialists, including a dietician, a homeopathic doctor as well as a gastroenterologist who had carried out a colonoscopy and full blood count, both of which were normal. She had obviously researched IBS herself on the internet and had decided to try hypnotherapy as a last resort.
Pamela had two sisters. Her older sister suffered from cerebral palsy: this interfered with leg movement, but didn’t prevent her from working as a manger of a cleaning company. She also had a younger sister who was very much less intelligent than her; as a result, her family, in particular her mother, decided to protect her two sisters by under-playing her superior intellect. Nevertheless, she went to university, obtained a degree and became a qualified teacher. She emigrated to Canada because of her husband’s job, but promised her older son that they would return to the UK so that he could take his degree in England.
She had two sons. Her older son, having obtained his degree, was now working as a banker in central London, whereas her younger son, who was just finishing school, had been classified in Canada as a ‘slow learner’. This led her to investigate this problem in the UK: she wondered whether he had been suffering from dyslexia, and, when this diagnosis had been confirmed, she decided to take a one year postgraduate course in special learning difficulties. She used this qualification primarily to help her younger son with his reading problems; but also, she taught other children suffering from dyslexia, and they came to her home. Unfortunately, the erratic nature of her IBS symptoms, with its alternating diarrhoea and constipation, had become so severe that she felt that she was unable to continue with her teaching. At the time of the first appointment, her older son was working as a banker, while her younger son, having taken a gap year, had just started university. Pamela’s family was living in Essex, while her recently bereaved mother lived on her own in Derby approximately 130 miles away. The other two daughters had always lived nearby, whereas Pamela, much to her mother’s consternation, had moved away from the area some time ago and had lived in Canada for several years. In the space of one hour, she had been able to identify succinctly the key factors which had been responsible for her refractory IBS.
A week later, she was too frightened to come for her consultation as it would have meant her travelling on her own. It was suggested to her that she should have a telephone session instead. During the course of this session (session 2), Pamela described in detail the precise route from her home to the consulting room. She said that she would have to travel by bus because she could not cope with travelling on the London Underground-clearly, she was also suffering from agoraphobia of which she seemed to be completely unaware. Over the previous week, she had given a great deal of thought to her problems, and she decided to utilize the session to explore these issues in greater detail. Quite a part from her bowel symptoms, she also suffered from flying phobia and arachnophobia.
Pamela had her first hypnosis session four days later (session 3), and as her special place she chose sitting alone in a comfortable chair at home. She was a good hypnotic subject and achieved a great deal of hand levitation. In the hypnosis, Pamela described her various abdominal symptoms in detail; she was then given the post hypnotic suggestion to carry out self hypnosis for ten minutes a day using the association word ‘calm’. During the next week, she did attempt to use self hypnosis but found this initially difficult to achieve; she had also read about the river metaphor on the internet, but felt that this, on its own, would not adequately deal with her underlying problems. During the hypnosis, Pamela wanted to clarify in her own mind whether the aim of the treatment was to control her IBS symptoms or to affect a cure: the therapist (TK) assured her that the aim was to work towards a complete recovery. It was in her next hypnosis session (session 5) that she opened up and was able to talk about her lack of self esteem; in particular, she talked about the time when she first arrived in Canada and some of the problems connected with her over-bearing sister-in-law. This was an important session for Pamela as she realized that her sister-in-law had increased her anxiety and that this had a deleterious effect on her well-being and self esteem. It was at this point that the therapist re-iterated that her emotional problems had had a enormous impact on her IBS.
When she came for her sixth session, she was delighted to report that she had been able to make a surprise visit to her mother on Sunday: this involved a two and a half hour drive in each direction. She had also been able to go to the dentist, which was complicated for her, and had managed to travel on her own to the consulting room. In the hypnosis which followed, she wanted to re-experience and work through some of the difficulties associated with the visit to her mother in Derby. Her mother had suggested that it would be quite simple, on future occasions, for her to fly to Derby, and implied that she would visit her more frequently if she were a dutiful daughter. Following the visit to her mother, Pamela’s IBS symptoms increased in severity.
The hypnotherapy (in session 7) focused on her abdomen; she was given soothing suggestions, including the river metaphor, and direct suggestions that her abdominal pain, diarrhoea, frequency and bloating would reduce in intensity. After this, Pamela was able to release a great deal of resentment towards her mother who had never forgiven her for emigrating to Canada and constantly criticized her for not visiting often enough. She also pointed out that, when her mother did come to visit her in Canada, she behaved like a guest and refused to help with the running of the house, remaining in bed for the entire week. It was pointed out to her-and this hit her quite hard-that her mother was at the source of her complex phobic disturbance and this was re-iterated in sessions 8 and 9.
At this stage, the hypnosis took on the following three-stage format:
1 Special place consisting of her sitting in her favourite chair at home, either reading the newspaper or watching television
2 Soothing suggestions given to counteract the various bowel symptoms such as diarrhoea, bloating and frequency
3 Free association to explore interpersonal relationships within the family
During the next three sessions (sessions 10, 11 and 12), Pamela was pleased to report that there had been improvements in two main areas. First, she said that she had been able to go out to dinner without experiencing any abdominal symptoms, and she felt that this was a major improvement. Secondly, she was now able go up to her bedroom on her own without having to wait for her husband to check for spiders. These sessions focused on Pamela’s resentment towards her mother coupled with her feelings of disloyalty about talking about her. In fact, she had been made to feel guilty for most of her life; first, she moved away from the family home, and then, whenever she wrote to her mother and went to visit, her mother implied that it was not good enough. In fact, her mother expected Pamela to ring every evening without fail and this had led to a lot of resentment.
In session 13, Pamela was keen to rehearse a forthcoming flight to the south of France as she found travelling abroad very complicated; in particular, we focused on the car journey at the other end where she felt that she was furthest from base. It was here that we discussed her apparent flying phobia. It was pointed out to her that her phobia was directly related to her feelings of guilt about being separated from her mother, and that she felt increasingly anxious the further she travelled away from her.
In the sixteenth session, Pamela was pleased that she had made considerable progress: her travelling had improved remarkably, she had no problems visiting her dentist and she had managed to limit phone calls to her mother to alternate days. In addition, she had been able to be assertive towards her mother and pointed out that she would not expect her own sons to ring her every day and that this was an excessive demand on her mother’s part.
In the eighteenth session, Pamela expressed that she felt sensitive about having a very much wealthier lifestyle when compared with her two sisters; these emotions compounded her already intense feelings about moving away from her mother and two sisters. Even so, a week later, she was able to travel to France-her first trip abroad in 2 ½ years-and reported, during session 19, that the journey had been a great success. She had hoped that, on her return, she might receive a telephone call from her mother, but this did not take place. In fact, she commented that her mother expected her to phone but never made outgoing phone calls: it was obvious that she disapproved of her daughter’s newfound independence.
In session 24, she recognized that her abdominal symptoms worsened following two distressing telephone calls from her sons. Her older son said that he was not coping with the excessively long working hours at the bank, and said that he needed to take a six month break, while her younger son had decided to opt out of university before completing his first year. Pamela wanted work through these problems in the consulting room, and, over the next week, her abdominal symptoms reduced.
In session 26, she was proud of the fact that she had been able to travel to the south of France, and felt much better on this occasion. In the next session (session 27), Pamela was delighted to report that she had been able to travel to Amsterdam and, more importantly, for the first time in her life, she had felt perfectly free to roam around the city on her own. This was a turning point in her treatment and she felt proud and emancipated; in addition, her IBS had improved significantly, and this, in turn, meant that she was able to eat normal meals without the fear of developing severe abdominal symptoms.
In session 33, the therapist (TK) commented that she exercised strict control over her children; and, when she went home, she asked her husband about this and he confirmed that this was the case. Pamela took great exception to this comment. Importantly, she was able to express a great deal of anger, and this was directed towards the therapist in the next session (session 34). As a result, her bowel symptoms improved dramatically and these improvements continued until she decided to terminate the therapy in the 38th session.
In a follow-up telephone interview a year later, Pamela said that she had been symptom free for nine months, although she had had a temporary set back when her mother died six weeks earlier. In order to cope with the funeral, understandably a difficult experience, she decided to use self hypnosis and this gave her the necessary strength to manage the situation. She also indicated that she used self hypnosis for difficult situations-going shopping or visiting the dentist-but she was proud to be able to tell her therapist that she was now able to go shopping on her own and that, all round, she was functioning extremely well.
This paper clearly demonstrates that the combined use of hypnotherapy with psychodynamic psychotherapy is capable of leading to a complete recovery.
The psychotherapy focused on the highly abnormal relationship that she had with her mother, and her feelings of guilt about moving away from the family home. She was also made to suppress her high intelligence as a child to protect her two sisters; and, later in life, when she became financially superior, her initial conditioned response was to suppress, or feel guilty about, her wealth. It was as a result of this relationship and overall family dynamics that she developed a number of phobic symptoms-these included arachnophobia, dental phobia, agoraphobia and difficulties travelling abroad by air, the latter, in this case, being a function of her separation anxiety disorder. During the treatment, it became increasingly apparent that she harboured a great deal of resentment and anger towards her mother, and several sessions were devoted to expressing these powerful feelings to the therapist. A pivotal point in the therapy occurred when the patient transferred a great deal of this anger onto the therapist; this had a releasing effect on her IBS and dramatically improved her emotional state. It was shortly after this that she felt able to terminate treatment.
While the underlying psychological factors were of fundamental importance, the hypnotherapy has been essential to the overall treatment program. Using the river metaphor, the soothing suggestions had a direct effect on her bowel symptoms, while, concurrently, the underlying factors associated with her IBS were explored. Further, the patient learnt to use self hypnosis, and she found this extremely helpful not only for her IBS symptoms but also for her various phobic disturbances. At one year follow up, this improvement was maintained.
Corresponding author: Contact DMJ Kraft at email@example.com
Alpers DH (2006). Diet and irritable bowel syndrome. Current Opinion in Gastroenterology, 22 (2):136-139.
American Gastroenterological Association (2006). Symposium. Rome III: new criteria for functional GI disorders. Los Angeles, California on May 23, 2006.
Bennett P, Wilkinson S (1985). A comparison of psychological and medical treatment of the irritable bowel syndrome. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 24 (part 3): 215-216.
Bittner AC, Croffut RM, Stranahan MC (2005). Prescript-assist probiotic-prebiotic treatment for irritable bowel syndrome: a methodologically oriented, 2-week randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical study. Clinical Therapeutics, 27 (6): 755-761.
Brandt LJ, Locke GR, Olden K, Quigley E, Schoenfeld P, Schuster M & Talley N (2002). An evidence-based approach to the management of irritable bowel syndrome in North America. American Journal of Gastroenterology, 97 (Suppl.): S1-27.
Camilleri M (2001). Review article: Tegaserod. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapy, 15 (3): 277-89.
Cann PA, Read NW, Holdsworth CD, & Barends D (1984). Role of Loperamide and placebo in management of irritable bowel syndrome. Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 29 (3): 239-247.
Cook IJ, Irvine EJ, Campbell D, Shannon S, Reddy SN, Collins SM (1990). Effect of dietary fiber on symptoms and rectosigmoid motility in patients with irritable bowel syndrome. A controlled, cross over study. Gastroenterology, 98: 66?72.
Creed F (2006). How do SSRIs help patients with irritable bowel syndrome? Gut, 55: 1065-1067.
Cremonini F, Delgado-Aros S, Camilleri M (2003). Efficacy of alosetron in irritable bowel syndrome: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Neurogastroenterology & Motility, 15 (1): 79?86.
Drossman DA, Toner BB, Whitehead WE, Diamant NE, Dalton CB, Duncan S, Emmott S, Proffitt V, Akman D, Frusciante K, Le T, Meyer K, Bradshaw B, Mikula K, Morris CB, Blackman CJ, Hu Y, Jia H, Li JZ, Koch GG & Bangdiwala SI (2003). Cognitive-behavioural therapy versus education and desipramine versus placebo for moderate to severe functional bowel disease. Gastroenterology, 125:19-31.
Drossman DA (2006). The functional gastrointestinal disorders and the Rome III Process. Gastroenterology, 130 (5): 1377-1390
Efskind PS, Bernklev T, Vatn MH (1996). A double-blind placebo-controlled trial with loperamide in irritable bowel syndrome. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, 31: 463?8.
FAO/WHO. Working Group Report on Drafting Guidelines for the Evaluation of Probiotics in Food. London, Ontario, Canada: May 1, 2002.
Farthing, M (2004) Treatment options in irritable bowel syndrome. Best Practice & Research Clinical Gastroenterology, 18 (4): 773-786.
Floch MH & Narayan R (2002). Diet in the Irritable Bowel Syndrome. Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology, 35 (1) Suppl.: S45-S52.
Forbes A, MacAuley S & Chiotakakou-Faliakou E (2000). Hypnotherapy and therapeutic audiotape: effective in previously unsuccessfully treated irritable bowel syndrome. International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 15: 328-334.
Giannini EG, Mansi C, Dulbecco P & Savarino V (2006). Role of partically hydrolyzed guar gum in the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome. Nutrition, 22 (3): 334-342.
Gholamrezaei A, Ardestani SK & Emami MH (2006). Where does hypnotherapy stand in the management of irritable bowel syndrome? A systematic review. The Journal of Alternative and Complimentary Medicine, 12 (6): 517-527.
Gonsalkorale WM (2006). Gut-directed hypnotherapy: the Manchester approach for treatment of irritable bowel syndrome. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 54 (1): 27-50.
Greenbaum DS, Mayle JE, Vanegeren LE, Jerome JA, Mayor JW, Greenbaum RB, Matson RW, Stein GE, Dean HA, Halvorsen NA, Rosen LW (1987). Effects of desipramine on irritable bowel syndrome compared with atropine and placebo. Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 32 (3): 257?66.
Homann HH, Kemen M, Fuessenich C, Senkal M, Zumtobel V (1994). Reduction in diarrhea incidence by soluble fiber in patients receiving total or supplemental enteral nutrition. Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, 18 (6): 486-90.
Houghton LA, Calvert EL, Jackson NA, Cooper P & Whorwell PJ (2002). Visceral sensation and emotion: a study using hypnosis. Gut, 51: 701-704.
Hovdenak N (1987). Loperamide treatment of the irritable bowel syndrome. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterlogy, 130:81-84.
Johanson JF (2004). Options for patients with irritable bowel syndrome: contrasting traditional and novel serotonergic therapies. Neurogastroenterology & Motility, 16 (6): 701-711.
Kennedy T, Jones R, Darnley S, Seed P, Wessely S, Chalder T (2005). Cognitive behaviour therapy in addition to antispasmodic treatment for irritable bowel syndrome in primary care: randomised controlled trial. British Medical Journal, 331: 435-437.
Klein KB (1988). Controlled treatment trials in the irritable bowel syndrome: a critique. Gastroenterology, 95 (1): 232-241.
Kline RM, Kline JJ, Di Palma J, Barbero GJ (2001). Enteric-coated, pH-dependant peppermint oil capsules for the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome in children. The Journal of Pediatrics, 138 (1): 125-128.
Lackner JM, Mesmer C, Morley S, Dowzer C & Hamilton S (2004). Psychological treatments for irritable bowel syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72 (6): 1100-1113.
Lembo T, Rink R (2002). Current pharmacologic treatments of irritable bowel syndrome. Participate (International Foundation for Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders), 11 (2). Summer: 1-4.
Liu JH, Chen GH, Yeh HZ, Huang CK, Poon SK (1997). Enteric-coated peppermint oil capsules in the treatment of irritable bowl syndrome: a prospective, randomized trial. Journal of Gastroenterology, 32 (6): 765-768.
Longstreth GF, Fox DD, Youkeles L, Forsythe AB, Wolochow DA (1981). Psyllium therapy in the irritable bowel syndrome. Annals of Internal Medicine, 95 (1): 53?6.
Lynch PM, Zamble E. (1989) A controlled behavioral treatment study of irritable bowel syndrome. Behavior Therapy, 20: 509-523.
Manning AP, Thompson WG, Heaton KW & Morris AF (1978). Towards positive diagnosis of the irritable bowel. British Medical Journal, 2 (6138): 653-654.
Müller-Lissner SA, Fumagalli I, Bardhan KD, Pace F, Pecher E, Nault B & Rüegg P (2001). Tegaserod, a 5-HT4 receptor partial agonist, relieves symptoms in irritable bowel syndrome patients with abdominal pain, bloating and constipation, Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 15 (10): 1655-1666.
Myren J, Groth H, Larssen SE, Larsen S (1982). The effect of trimipramine in patients with the irritable bowel syndrome. A double-blind study. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, 17 (7): 871?5.
Niedzielin K, Kordecki H, Birkenfeld B (2001). A controlled, double-blind, randomized study on the efficacy of Lactobacillus plantarum 299V in patients with irritable bowel syndrome. European Journal of Gastroenterlogy and Hepatology, 13 (10): 1143-7.
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation. Zelnorm (Tegaserod maleate) (2002). Prescribing Information. East Hanover, NJ: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation.
Novick, J, Miner P, Krause R, Glebas K, Bliesath H, Ligozio G, Ruegg P & Lefkowitz M (2002). A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of Tegaserod in female patients suffering from irritable bowel syndrome with constipation. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 16 (11): 1877-1888.
O’Mahony, L, McCarthy J, Kelly P, Hurley G, Luo F, Chen K, O’Sullivan GC, Kiely B, Collins JK, Shanahan F & Quigley EM (2005). Lactobacillus and bifidobacterium in irritable bowel syndrome: symptom responses and relationship to cytokine profiles. Gastroenterology, 128 (3):541-551.
Piai G, Visconti M, Imbimbo BP, Minieri M, Sollazzo R, Mazzaca G (1987). Long-term treatment of irritable bowel syndrome with cimetropium bromide, a new antimuscarinic compound. Current Therapeutic Research, 41 (6): 967?77.
Poynard T, Regimbeau C & Benhamou Y (2001). Meta-analysis of smooth muscle relaxants in the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome. Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 15 (3): 355-361.
Prior A, Whorwell PJ (1987). Double blind study of ispaghula in irritable bowel syndrome. Gut, 28: 1510?3.
Rees WD, Evans BK & Rhodes J (1979). Treating irritable bowel syndrome with peppermint oil. British Medical Journal, 2 (6194): 835-836.
Ritchie JA, Truelove SC (1979). Treatment of irritable bowel syndrome with lorazepam, hyoscine butylbromide, and ispaghula husk. British Medical Journal, 1 (6160): 376?8.
Schoenfeld P (2005). Efficacy of current drug therapies in irritable bowel syndrome: what works and does not work. Gastroenterology Clinics of North America, 34 (2): 319-335.
Shaw G, Srivastava ED, Sadlier M, Swann P, James JY, Rhodes J (1991). Stress management for irritable bowel syndrome: a controlled trial. Digestion, 50 (1): 36-42.
Snook J, Shepherd HA (1994). Bran supplementation in the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 8 (5): 511?4.
Steinhart MJ, Wong PY, Zarr ML (1981). Therapeutic usefulness of amitriptyline in spastic colon syndrome. International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine, 11 (1): 45?57.
Stephen AM & Cummings JH (1980). Mechanism of action of dietary fibre in the human colon. Nature, 284: 283-4.
Tack J, Broekaert D & Fischler B, Van Oudenhove L, Gevers AM & Janssens J (2006). A controlled crossover study of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor citalopram in irritable bowel syndrome. Gut, 55: 1095-1103.
Toner BB, Segal ZV, Emmott S, Myran D, Ali A, DiGasbarro I & Stuckless N (1998). Cognitive-behavioral group therapy for patients with irritable bowel syndrome. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 48 (2): 215-243.
Toner BB, Stuckless N, Ali A, Downie F, Emmott S, Akman D (1998). The development of a cognitive scale for functional bowel disorders. Psychosomatic Medicine, 60 (4): 492-497.
Tuohy KM, Probert HM, Smejkal CW, Gibson GR (2003). Using probiotics and prebiotics to improve gut health. Drug Discovery Today, 8 (15): 692-700.
Van Loo J (2004). The specificity of the interaction with intestinal bacterial fermentation by prebiotics determines their physiological efficacy. Nutrition Research Reviews, 17:89-98.
Vij JG, Jiloha RG, Kumar N, Madhu SV, Malika V, Anand BS (1991). Effect of antidepressant drug (doxepin) on irritable bowel syndrome patients. Indian Journal of Psychiatry, 33: 243?6.
Wheatley D (1976). Irritable colon syndrome treated with an anti-spasmodic drug. Practitioner, 217: 276?80.
Whorwell PJ, Prior A, Faragher EB (1984). Controlled trial of hypnotherapy in the treatment of severe refractory irritable-bowel syndrome. Lancet, 2 (8414): 1232-1234.
Whorwell PJ, Krumholz S, Müller-Lissner SM, Schmitt C, Dunger-Baldauf C, Rueegg PC (2000). Tegaserod has a favorable safety and tolerability profile in patients with constipation-predominant and alternating forms of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Gastroenterology, 118 (4) Suppl 2: A1204.
Whorwell PJ (2006). Effective management of irritable bowel syndrome: the Manchester model. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 54 (1): 21-26.
Whorwell PJ, Altringer L, Morel J, Bond Y, Charbonneau D, O’Mahony L, Kiely B, Shanahan F, Quigley EM (2006). Efficacy of an encapsulated probiotic Bifidobacterium infantis 35624 in women with irritable bowel syndrome. American Journal of Gastroenterology, 101 (7): 1581-1590.
Young P, Cash BD (2006). Probiotic use in irritable bowel syndrome. Current Gastroenterology Reports, 8 (4): 321-326.
Zimmerman J (2003). Cleaning up the river: a metaphor for functional digestive disorders. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 45 (4): 353-359.
Zuckerman MJ (2006). The role of fiber in the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome: therapeutic recommendations. Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology, 40 (2): 104-108.